Internet Taxation :: Government Political Essays

network TaxationShould We Tax the earnings? was written in response to the recent findings of the Advisory Commission on Electronic doctor in the May 2000 issue of The American Spectator. The argument is between the liberals and conservatives on the issue of whether or non to tax net purchases. The liberals call up that Internet purchases should be taxed so that state and local tax bases are not eroded beca implement of increasing Internet purchases. On the other end the conservatives believe that Internet purchases should be kept tax-free, since tracking sales are stainless and several states are involved with each purchase. George Gilder the author of Should We Tax the Internet? is extremely conservative in his views and is against all taxes. The article aims to convince its readers that Internet taxation is unlawful and should not implemented because of past tax increases results. To set out Gilders arguments he uses password arguments based on facts and reasons. Gilder implements his arguments into his article by relating the arguments to different peoples views and things. Gilders main argument is that subvert tax evaluate gene grade more revenue than higher unrivalleds (Gilder 3). Through Gilders use of logos arguments, ethos arguments, and unique perspectives he makes an effective argument in favor of not implementing Internet taxes. Gilder starts off by attacking Republicans, which are traditionalistic conservative, by saying that they suffer from the tax-raising itch (Gilder 1). He then moves on to say that two billionaires that he recently talked to are more panicky of a reckless tax cut than war or terrorism. Gilder is head start his argument off by using ethos argument by endowment perspectives from high profile Silicon Valley cent millionaires. Gilder then goes onto to justify to his audience how taxes above a certain percent do not collect revenue. He does this by saying that there has only been one advance since J ohn Marshall opined that the power to tax is the power to destroy (Gilder 3). John Marshall made this advance by showing that lower tax rates generate more revenues than higher ones. This is a logos argument, but is a fallacy because higher taxes would lead to higher revenues quite an than lower taxes. Gilder then tries to make the argument that no tax rate above 20 percent collects revenue.